Hdr_About.jpg

Detail Analysis

link.png

Date:

Status:

Count:

Contributor:

March 14, 2022

info.png

Verified

1

zerofriction.io

Loss Amount:

-

info.png

Recovered Amount:

-

Currency:

Dollars

KYC By:

Audit By:

None

None

info.png

Website:

No data

Twitter:

No data

Discord:

No data

Telegram:

No data

Medium:

No data

Github:

No data

info.png

Key Indicators

Platform:

Type:

Category:

Method:

Solana

Protocol

Yield

Liquidity Management

Extended Method:

Whales DAO voted to rugpull project

Data Sources:

info.png

The Sol Invictus project was an Olympus DAO-like project on the Solana blockchain, much like the Wonderland project that went up in flames recently. Promising absolutely massive returns, with numbers like 60,000% APY being tossed around, people bought in hoping to see their money skyrocket. The project also partnered with major names in the Solana ecosystem, earning legitimacy.

However, although the project enjoyed a spike in price in November, the token has bled value since then. On March 9, the project leaders began a conversation about team salaries, where they also floated the idea of redeeming the treasury and closing the project. On March 11 they began a vote, which lasted only three days, and allowed members of the DAO to vote on whether the project should close and distribute treasury funds to participants. Much like the Wonderland vote in late January, a relatively small number of whales with a large share of the votes (who bought in early and still stood to make money on the project) were able to pass the vote to close the project, despite a majority of voters selecting to keep the project going. Furthermore, because the Invictus tokens used for voting also themselves hold the value, some people were unable to vote in the poll because their tokens were locked up in lending platforms where they had used them as collateral. Many participants in the project who haven't been actively watching the governance page likely don't even know the vote happened.

Some members of the project wrote on Discord that they felt rugged, with one even speculating that the project had been so eager to implement voting so they could pass a "community" vote to close the project and make off with a profit without damaging their reputations or potentially facing lawsuits. Various members of the project Discord shared how much they had lost: one person said they were down $20,000, another was down $75,000, and a third person reported losing $400,000. One person asked "who else is in the 6 figure loss club" and received three agreement emoji reactions; another person said they'd lost a year's salary. Some people already opted to try to sell their tokens early, worrying that the project leaders might make off with the treasury and not allow people to redeem their $IN; others waited in hopes of the redemption price being higher than the current token price; and some even suggested buying more $IN in hopes that they could make a profit if the redemption price is higher than the current price.

info.png

DISCLAIMER: While Zero Friction LLC has used the best efforts in aggregating and maintaining this database, Zero Friction LLC makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness, and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. 

Under no circumstances, shall Zero Friction LLC be liable for any loss of profit or funds, any regulatory or governmental penalties, any legal costs, or any other commercial and non-commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages from any or all usage of the dataset or information derived from our database.